Apologetics
Articles that defend the truth of the Christian faith
How to Get into Heaven? It’s Not a Matter of Opinion
0Whether heaven is real or not is not something determined by a wish or an opinion. What’s more, whether I get into heaven or not is ultimately up to Someone whose opinions count a whole lot more than mine. When it comes to religion in general, particularly issues related to where a person spends eternity, the truth should matter more to us than whether feelings are hurt. Ultimately, when I close my eyes in death, I recognize that public opinion polls will have nothing to do with where I spend eternity. What matters is whether I’ve staked my eternal destiny on the truth.
While I believe that everyone (those who practice faith and those who do not) should be kind, polite, and gracious, it nevertheless irks me to hear people embrace relativistic perspectives when it comes to religious truth claims. There’s been a lot of that recently, given bestselling author and mega-church pastor Joel Osteen’s categorization of Mitt Romney and Barack Obama as being “Christian.” I’m not going to get into Osteen’s comments per se. I understand he was trying to be gracious and polite, and that he believes in giving others the benefit of the doubt. What really bothers me is the social pressure many people apply to such questions in the first place. It’s as if opinions are more important than facts and that it’s completely unacceptable for someone (including pastors) to hold opinions that might (heaven forbid) hurt other people’s feelings!
If God is real, then He is real, whether you believe in Him or not. If Jesus rose from the dead, then the resurrection is a historical event that you must come to terms with, whether you want to or not or whether you “believe” it or not. If heaven is real, then heaven is indeed real, whether you believe in it or not. And if it’s real, then whether you spend eternity in it or not is something that’s not exactly under your control, since you had nothing to do with creating it.
Sadly, in our postmodernist culture, we’ve lumped religion in with matters of taste, opinion, and preference. The religion we’ve embraced is often categorized as a “private matter” and we resent others telling us we might be wrong. I fully understand that religious beliefs are sensitive, and I absolutely agree we should be civil, kind, and polite when discussing religion. I’ve always tried to share my Christian beliefs in a respectful and kind manner. But we’ve jettisoned common sense altogether if we somehow think that opinions and wishes are what determine ultimate reality at the end of the day.
I believe I should have the legal, moral, and social right to embrace Christianity. And I believe I should be allowed to live in peace without government interference and without persecution for embracing Christianity. But, at the end of the day, Christianity is either true or false…period. It’s not “true for me” while being “false” for someone else. It’s either true or it’s not….period. And either I will go to heaven when I die or I won’t. My wishes and my opinions don’t determine heaven’s existence nor do they control access to it (not for me and not for anyone else).
In a few years, my daughter will be applying to colleges and universities. Whether she gets in or not will be up to the admissions boards of those respective institutions. Her opinions won’t determine whether she gets in or not. The admissions boards determine whether she gets in or not. If heaven is real (and I believe that it is), then it’s up to the “admissions board” (so to speak). It’s up to the Gatekeeper.
The Bible presents Jesus Christ as the “Door.” He is the One who determines who gets to the Father….and who does not. In the fourteenth chapter of John’s Gospel, Jesus is recorded as declaring: “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father, except through Me.” That is a pretty specific statement, and it’s one that’s either true or it’s not. Ultimately, questions about whether Joel Osteen or Brian Tubbs agree with that statement (and thus hurt the feelings of those who disagree with it) don’t matter. What Jews, Muslims, atheists, or even Christians think about that statement doesn’t really matter in terms of ultimate truth. These are the only questions that matter:
- Did Jesus say those words?
- Did Jesus have the authority to say those words?
- What does it take then to get Jesus to let us through to the Father?
Those are the ONLY questions that matter in relation to John 14:6 and the central claim of Christianity, namely that Jesus is the way of salvation.
Having said all the above, I respect and support the freedom of every human being to practice his or her faith according to his or her conscience and choice. I also respect the rights of those to practice no faith. I do not believe the government should force anyone to embrace a certain religion, nor do I believe that Christians should force Jesus on others. (I also don’t believe a valedictorian invoking the name of God in her graduation speech or a chaplain praying in Jesus’ name at a public prayer constitute forcing religion on anyone, but that’s for another post). Christians should offer Jesus to the world, but not force Jesus on the world. It’s up to each person ultimately whether he or she accepts or rejects the Gospel message of Jesus Christ.
My main purpose in this post is simply this: Truth is not determined by opinion. Whether heaven is real or not is not a matter of preference or opinion. Heaven is either real or it isn’t. You can’t wish it into existence, nor can you wish it out of existence. The same is true for hell, by the way. Whether you get into heaven or not depends on who (or I should say “Who”) controls access to it, and whether you’re doing what the Gatekeeper says is necessary to obtain said access. That is what matters. When it comes to your eternal soul, it’s the only thing that matters.
How Can Christians be Effective Ambassadors for Christ?
0In his second letter to the church at Corinth, the Apostle Paul referred to evangelism with a metaphor that everyone in the Roman world would have understood. The verse to which I refer goes like this: “Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God” (2 Corinthians 5:20, NKJV).
In this video excerpt from one of his talks, Christian author Greg Koukl explains how Christians can be effective “ambassadors” for Christ by arming themselves with knowledge and tactics. Koukl, who heads the organization Stand to Reason, believes that every Christian should learn to be an effective witness for Jesus Christ. To that end, he wrote an excellent book titled Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions. Watch Koukl explain the importance of tactics in discussing one’s faith…
Sadly, many Christians today oppose the use of apologetics in witnessing. They say we should just proclaim the Gospel and (to use another metaphor) “let the chips fall where they may.” In some cases, these are Calvinists who believe that God has already chosen who will accept Christ, and thus human strategy is unnecessary for evangelism. Interestingly, Koukl is a Calvinist, and he doesn’t buy into that kind of lazy, cop-out nonsense. Some of the greatest preachers and evangelists in history were Calvinist. Think Charles Spurgeon. I personally don’t embrace all five points of the classic TULIP outline, but I have no problem with any Calvinist who nonetheless embraces and supports evangelism. There’s no need to divide on the issue of Calvinism, so long as we all agree that God hasn’t told us who He’s chosen and that we need to take the Gospel to “every creature” (Mark 16:15).
The second and main group that opposes the use of apologetics and/or evangelism tactics is simply those Christians who are lazy. Many Christians don’t want to study. They don’t want to exert themselves. They just want to hand out tracts (if that), invite people to church (if that), and call it a day. This is not what being an ambassador is all about. As Jude says, we must “contend earnestly for the faith,” and that means thorough study, preparation, and engagement.
Take a few minutes to listen to Greg Koukl’s talk, check out his book Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions, and then visit his website Stand to Reason for more information.
Dinesh D’Souza Lays Out Powerful Reasons to Embrace Christianity
0Bestselling author Dinesh D’Souza explains some of the strongest arguments for the existence of God and the reasonable claims of Christianity. D’Souza points out that, while atheists are on the offensive, their arguments and premise are actually quite vulnerable to scrutiny.
For more on D’Souza’s arguments, check out his excellent book What’s So Great About Christianity?
Al Mohler Interviews Former President Jimmy Carter on the Bible, Hell, Jesus, Homosexuality, and More
0Recently, Southern Baptist theologian Al Mohler had the privilege to discuss theology with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. Mohler is a prolific writer, popular radio broadcaster, and the head of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. Not long ago, Time magazine named him the “reigning intellectual” of evangelical Christianity. Though critical of Carter in the past, Mohler treated the 88-year old former President with great respect in this interview, which is to be both expected and commended.
Throughout his political career and presidency, James Earl Carter, Jr. has been quite open about his Christian faith. He is perhaps America’s most well-known Sunday school teacher, having taught for over sixty years. Recently, Carter collaborated with Zondervan to publish NIV Lessons from Life Bible: Personal Reflections with Jimmy Carter. Promotion of Carter’s new Bible was the occasion for the interview with Mohler.
To read this very interesting exchange, click on the following link…
“Former President Jimmy Carter Discusses Religion and Homosexuality”
I want to commend President Carter for his heart, integrity, and spirit of cordiality. I nevertheless agree with Dr. Mohler that Carter’s theology is problematic at best. Once you allow yourself to become “subjective” in how you read the Bible, you are on a slippery slope to relativism, and that’s not a place to which Christians should go.
Why Does God Allow Suffering at the Hands of Evil Men Like Joseph Kony?
0As a recently famous viral video Kony 2012 points out, Joseph Kony and his so-called “Lord’s Resistance Army” (LRA), a militant African guerrilla group, have inflicted horrific suffering on hundreds of thousands of people over the last two decades. Kony ranks toward the top of the International Criminal Court’s most wanted list for his barbaric human rights abuses, which include the kidnapping of children, murder, mutilation, and even cannibalism. He is evil personified, and for many, he represents one of the most graphic challenges to the notion that there exists an all-loving, all-powerful God who reigns over all the earth. How can a good God allow an evil man like Joseph Kony to cause such pain and suffering?
The same question of course can be asked of previous evil men, such as Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and so many other nefarious characters of the 20th century, who left (in the words of Dinesh D’Souza) “mountains of bodies and an ocean of blood.” How can a good God allow all that? Even apart from the evil dictators and warlords, you have enough suffering inflicted by serial killers, murderers, rapists, child molesters, religious cult leaders, etc. How can God allow so much evil and so much pain and suffering? It’s a question that has troubled millions over the centuries, causing many to question God’s existence, renounce their faith, or at least resign themselves to never-ending doubt and frustration.
The answer to the question “Why does God allow suffering?” is found in the Bible. It may not be an answer that’s emotionally satisfying, certainly not to someone who is presently suffering or whose loved one is suffering, but the answer is there. And it’s one I’ve personally wrestled with and explored in the Amazon bestseller When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain: Why Does God Allow Bad Things to Happen? And How Can Christians Cope With Pain and Suffering?
My mother was one of the most devout women of faith I’ve ever known. Yet I remember watching with great dismay and frustration her health deteriorate over the years, with God seemingly doing little but act as a spectator. It was a frustration that led me into two periods of intense doubt over my Christian faith. Yet I emerged from those periods of doubt, not because God cleaned everything up in my mom’s life or my life and wrapped everything up with nice pretty bows, but because I realized I was approaching the whole issue of pain and suffering from the wrong angle.
The Bible never promises a bed of roses in this life. In fact, the Bible tells us there will be pain and suffering, even for the righteous. In the New Testament, we’re told it will actually get worse as time marches on. We should not be surprised that there’s pain and suffering, nor should it cause us to question God’s existence. God tells us there will be pain and suffering. We may not like that, but it’s certainly not something that should cause us to question God’s reality or presence.
In the case of Joseph Kony, the book of James gives us insight as to what’s happening. The half-brother of Jesus writes: “From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?” (James 4:1, KJV). While James was not familiar with Joseph Kony, he knew all about the brutality of warfare. He knew of what he was speaking.
Sin hurts other people. And we live in a world full of 6 billion plus sinners! We will be affected by the sins of other people, just as others will often be affected by our sin. In some cases, the sins of others will be so grievous that the consequences will be horrendous in their scope and intensity. This may be unfair, from our emotional vantage point, but it’s the kind of world that we, the human race, have created.
For more on this subject, I hope you’ll check out When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain.
God bless you.
Free eBook: “When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain” — Available Feb 25 and 26 for No Cost.
2How can an all-powerful and good God allow pain, suffering, and evil in the world? That’s the leading objection to Christianity and the Bible today. And it’s the objection that moved me to write an eBook that I would like to offer you today for no charge.
If you act today (February 25) or tomorrow (February 26), you can get a free copy of my short eBook When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain. That’s right…FREE! In order to take advantage of this offer, you need to do the following three things:
- Sign up for an Amazon account (if you don’t already have one)
- Download a free Kindle app. The free Kindle app can be used to read Amazon Kindle eBooks on your PC, tablet (like an iPad) or smart phone. You just need to go to the following link for information and instructions… Free Kindle Reading Apps
- Once you have a Kindle reading app (or a physical Kindle), you just need to “purchase” my eBook for free and then download it to your PC or device.
Since the eBook is short, it is not available as a print book at this time. I may do an expanded version later, and make that available for print, but right now, it’s only available as an eBook for the Amazon Kindle or an Amazon Kindle reading application.
Since you’re getting this eBook for NO COST, I would like to ask the following of you…
Please leave a review on its Amazon sales page.
Your review can be as simple as 1 or 2 sentences. It doesn’t have to be anything extensive. But leaving this review will really help other readers make an informed decision about whether to invest in this resource. And it will help me out. Even if your comments are negative, I can take those into account for updates and revisions.
I hope you enjoy the eBook. Thank you.
Lee Strobel Offers the Case for Christmas
0Christmas is full of tradition, but can Christians credibly embrace the claims of the Bible surrounding the birth of Jesus, even in our present age of skepticism? Bestselling author Lee Strobel lays out the evidence for Jesus Christ and why we can trust the Gospel accounts of the first Christmas…
Demystifying the Trinity: Does the Trinity Represent a Contradiction in Christianity?
0
The doctrine of the Trinity maintains that God is one God in three Persons. It is perhaps the most confusing and contentious belief in evangelical Christianity. The Trinitarian view has drawn the scorn of numerous critics of Christianity, and even from some who consider themselves Christian.
The Trinity in the Bible
While the word “Trinity” appears nowhere in the Bible, the apostle John wrote in his first epistle that “there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one” (I John 5:7). With the advent of textual criticism, a majority of biblical scholars have called the authenticity of I John 5:7 into question, pointing out that most of the Greek manuscripts do not contain verse. Even if I John 5:7 is set aside, however, the doctrine of the Trinity can still be inferred from other passages, including the account of Jesus’ baptism (Matthew 3:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21-23).
The author of the Gospel of John describes Jesus as “the Word” and writes that the “Word was with God and the Word was God.” (John 1.) And references to the Spirit of God abound throughout Scripture. In the Great Commission, Jesus ties all three together, instructing his disciples to baptize new believers “in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:18-20).
Is the Trinity Logical?
Critics of the doctrine of the Trinity maintain that a Triune God smacks of polytheism and contradicts the way Jehovah is presented in the Old Testament. Christian theologian Norman Geisler argues that the doctrine of the Trinity is not a contradiction. Says Geisler, “A contradiction occurs only when something is A and non-A at the same time and in the same sense. God is both three and one at the same time but not in the same sense. He is three persons but one in essence. He is three persons but only one in nature.” (Zacharias, Ravi and Geisler, Norman. Who Made God? And Answers to Over 100 Other Tough Questions of Faith. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2003).
The late great Christian thinker C.S. Lewis explained that the human mind often has a tough time grasping the Trinity because we are limited to one-dimensional experience. However, once we remove those limitations from our mind (or at least open ourselves up to the possibility of their removal), we begin to see reality in a different perspective. In Mere Christianity, Lewis explains:
A world of one dimension would be a straight line. In a two-dimensional world, you still get straight lines, but many lines make one figure. In a three-dimensional world, you still get figures but many figures make one solid body. In other words, as you advance to more real and more complicated levels, you do not leave behind you the things you found on the simpler levels: you still have them, but combined in new ways – in ways you could not imagine if you knew only the simpler levels.
In a talk at Penn State University, brilliant Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias, picks up on Lewis’ argument. While strongly defending the Law of Non-Contradiction as a key pillar of Reason, Zacharias argues that the Trinity represents no logical contradiction whatsoever. In fact, Zacharias says that the Trinitarian God avoids breaking the Law of Non-Contradiction. The Bible, for example, presents God as a God of Love. How would this be possible if God were a singular Being with no one to love? With the Trinity, one can appreciate the fact that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit each loved one another before the human race was created.
Farewell Christopher Hitchens
4Christopher Hitchens, one of the most outspoken critics of evangelical Christianity (and religion, in general, for that matter), died yesterday, December 15, of esophageal cancer. A powerful intellect with acerbic wit, Hitchens was both prolific and provocative. In fact, his entire public identity revolved around provocation. Matt Schudel of The Washington Post accurately describes Hitchens as a “sharp-witted provocateur who used his formidable learning, biting wit and muscular prose style to skewer what he considered high-placed hypocrites, craven lackeys of the right and left, ‘Islamic fascists’ and religious faith of any kind.”
My first brush with Hitchens came several years ago, when I explored some of my own doubts with Christianity. Having been brought up in a Christian family and placed in church at a young age, my decision to accept Christ as a pre-teen was more a natural outcome than turning point. Starting in my twenties, however, I began to experience sharp emotional and intellectual doubts about the faith my family and I had always claimed. In my early to mid thirties, I went on a spiritual and intellectual journey, willing to set aside my Christian beliefs if I could not find some logical and compelling justification for them. As part of this journey, I read, watched, and listened to several of the so-called “New Atheists,” including Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and (yes) Christopher Hitchens.
I became somewhat of a debate addict, watching recorded encounters between atheists and Christians. YouTube was a favorite place for me to go and watch these clashes. And I experienced mixed emotions as I saw Hitchens sarcastically and convincingly eviscerate standard Christian arguments that, in my youth, I had all too casually accepted. In the book of Proverbs, we’re told that “iron sharpens iron” and that “one person sharpens another.” I doubt Hitchens wanted to sharpen my faith, but that was the outcome. My journey through doubt led me to become even stronger in my faith.
When the Reverend Jerry Falwell, founder of Thomas Road Baptist Church and Liberty University, passed away in 2007, Christopher Hitchens displayed an animosity that can only be borne out of a bitter and hateful heart. By the time Falwell passed, I had already emerged from my period of doubt, though there remained a shadow of appreciation for some of Hitchens’ more effective arguments. That appreciation all but vanished as I watched Hitchens celebrate Falwell’s death and more or less dance on the man’s grave. Hitchens viciously assaulted Falwell’s character, intellect, appearance, and very soul. In one TV interview, the atheist Hitchens openly wished hell were real, so that Jerry Falwell could go there.
As angry as I was at Hitchens’ over-the-top antics and insensitivity to Falwell’s family and friends, I nevertheless glimpsed the hatred that propelled Hitchens onto his atheistic crusade in the first place. This was not a man with honest doubts about God. It was a man who, deep down, suspected the Judeo-Christian God may indeed exist – and hated the very thought, idea, and concept of such a God. Christopher Hitchens didn’t simply disbelieve God. He hated God and all of God’s followers. I believe it’s the same for many atheists, in fact. If you doubt me, I encourage you to read The Rage Against God by Peter Hitchens, younger brother of Christopher Hitchens.
I take no pleasure in the demise of Christopher Hitchens. On the contrary, I extend my sincere best wishes to his family and friends. I sincerely hope he read his younger brother’s book and that he and Peter had many talks since its publication. I hope that, by some miracle, God broke through the bitter walls around Hitchens’ heart. I hope that, as Hitchens entered the last days of his life, that he reflected on the loving message of Jesus Christ. After all, God did it before nearly 2000 years ago with a vicious anti-Christian named Saul of Tarsus. Why not Christopher Hitchens as well? We can hope.
Does God Want You to be Rich? An Analysis of Prosperity Theology
3
Joel Osteen, the pastor of America’s largest church, preaches a message of hope and inspiration that many people consider to be “prosperity theology,” the idea that God wants you to be healthy and wealthy in your time on this earth and that the Bible provides instructions on how to achieve those things in your life. It’s been said that “lies” or misleading claims are most dangerous when truth is mixed in. I believe this is the case with false doctrines as well. And let me be the first to say that prosperity theology can be a very dangerous doctrine.
High-profile televangelists and mega-church pastors who proclaim to their followers the virtues of Christian giving and tithing, while themselves living the high life with Armani suits and private jets have always struck this WalMart shopper as self-serving opportunists. As a pastor, I have frequently criticized “health and wealth” prosperity preaching as being dangerous and often heretical. While I stand by those warnings, I nevertheless feel that perhaps evangelical Christians critical of prosperity theology in general, and preachers like Joel Osteen in particular, too often “throw out the baby with the bathwater.”
Does God Want You to be Poor?
Recently, I attended a multi-day training event in Los Angeles, California for motivational speakers. I went because I believe that pastors can and should borrow insights, at times, from the business world. And I knew that the conference would provide some excellent training on public speaking, time management, organization, and marketing. I was not disappointed. It also allowed me to meet some very interesting people, including Bob Yates, a fellow ordained minister who runs a company called Circle of Champions. Bob’s company trains people, especially Christians, in the areas of personal and professional development. Many of his seminars deal with how Christians can achieve financial success through starting businesses and establishing what he (and other financial experts call) “multiple streams of income.”
During one of our many conversations this past weekend, we talked about how many Bible-believing Christians approach what they perceive as “prosperity theology” with deep suspicion. I too shared my concerns with prosperity theologians, including how there’s too much emphasis on financial gain and not enough on eternity. At one point, Bob posed a question that I will never forget. Without meaning to get melodramatic, the question has shifted my thinking on this subject. His question was simple: “How many people do you benefit by being poor?”
Chewing on that question for some time, I realized that it could easily be asked in this way: “Does God really want you to be poor?” I think many conscientious, well-intentioned, Bible-believing Christians feel (deep down) that He does. And let me say that I think there are seasons in which God will take His followers through poverty. The best example of this is Jesus Christ Himself, who had an interesting encounter with a would-be follower while traveling toward Jerusalem. In the ninth chapter of the Gospel of Luke, we read this:
Now it happened as they journeyed on the road, that someone said to Him, “Lord, I will follow You wherever You go.” And Jesus said to him, “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.” -Luke 9:57-58
Clearly, there will be times when answering God’s call in your life means giving up material comforts and/or possessions. The early church in Acts brought all that they had to the apostles. Such was their commitment to God’s work! The “Great Faith Chapter” in Hebrews tells of men and women losing all that they had, including their lives, to follow Christ. The examples of this are numerous. And anyone who preaches that God only wants or even that He primarily wants physical health and/or material wealth for His followers is distorting Scripture.
Nevertheless, the Bible provides too many teachings on healthy financial living for us to conclude that the above paragraph represents the complete story. Returning to the example of Jesus, what about the thirty years before He began His ministry? Can we agree that the Son of Man most certainly did have a place to “lay his head” while likely serving as an apprentice to His earthly carpenter-father, Joseph? I’m not suggesting that Jesus was materially wealthy prior to beginning His ministry, but I am saying that His needs were provided for. Not provided for in some mystical, abstract “God will provide” kind of way, but rather due to timeless principles of work, stewardship, and provision that God wrote into the very DNA of Creation and the human race.
The Spiritual Cost of Poverty
While I understand that God does call people, at times, to financial sacrifice, let’s get one thing straight. I agree with Bob Yates, Joel Osteen, and others who say that there’s nothing inherently noble in poverty. In and of itself, poverty isn’t noble. It’s tragic.
Have you been in a situation where you can’t earn enough to put food on the table for yourself or for your family? Do you know what it’s like to lose your home because you can’t pay the rent or mortgage? Or perhaps you haven’t actually lost your home, but the shadow of losing it haunts you and your family? I know of many Christians who are completely dependent on the compassion and generosity of others, because they lack the ability (be it the health, skills, resources, know-how, or circumstances) to provide for themselves? While there are exceptions to this next statement, I’ve found that every Christian in such a situation feels trapped in more than just financial poverty. They feel emotionally and spiritually impoverished as well. Is that God’s plan for them?
Let’s take the focus off middle-class or lower-class America and shine the spotlight on other people groups in the world. Picture in your mind’s eye the millions of children suffering right now from excruciating poverty, who live in disease-ridden squalor and who are literally starving to death? Not only do I want to ask you whether that represents “God’s best” for them, I also want to ask whether you’re financially in a position to do anything about their suffering?
Consider how physical, emotional, and financial health all intertwine and deeply impact one’s spiritual outlook on life. In disadvantaged nations, those things can intertwine to impact your health and safety. In America, their effects may not be quite as dramatic, but they are there. Do I actually need to cite the statistics to prove how money-related challenges can lead to anxiety, stress, and depression as well as serious marriage and health problems? The evidence is so overwhelming that one would be foolish to deny such an obvious truth.
Not only is the cost of poverty evident in the lives of individuals and families, but it’s also felt in churches. It’s no secret that these recessionary times in which we live have resulted in decreased financial giving to churches and ministries. With less money to go around in their personal finances, Christians are giving less to God’s work, even though tithing is a fundamental teaching of God’s Word. As a result, churches are not able to do as much as they could to expand God’s kingdom. In the church I’m currently privileged to pastor, we’ve seen almost double growth in our attendance in the last two years, but financial giving has barely increased. More people are coming to church, but only a fraction of them are giving financially.
Commenting on the dangers of prosperity theology, well-known evangelical leader Rick Warren categories the idea that “God wants everyone to be wealthy” as “baloney.” Warren, the pastor of Saddleback Church in California and author of the bestselling The Purpose-Driven Life, says: “You don’t measure your self-worth by your net worth. I can show you millions of faithful followers of Christ who live in poverty.” I agree, but should Christians strive for poverty? That is the question.
And let’s be clear. That is the question we’re talking about in this article. You’ve heard the saying: “If you’re not growing, you’re dying.” Likewise, if you’re not growing financially, you’re declining financially. Money is fluid. It’s dynamic, especially in our changing economic times. If you make $50,000 in 2011 and do not get a raise in 2012, then you are making less money in 2012. You are falling behind financially. That’s an economic fact. It’s true that we shouldn’t put our primary focus on material gain, but what Bible passage teaches that we should aim for financial loss? Where does it say in the Bible that, to be a good Christian, you should do what you can to make sure you make less money each year?
I would rather hear a message preached by Rick Warren or, even better, John MacArthur, than, say, Joel Osteen. But I agree wholeheartedly with Osteen, when he says: “I think we should have a mindset that God wants us to prosper in our relationships, our health, and our finances.” Is that not what the apostle John wishes for his readers in 3 John 2?
The Dangers in Prosperity Theology
It’s absolutely true that many well-known prosperity preachers have succumbed to greed and excess. And it’s also true that many “health and wealth” ministries have milked their adherents of millions of hard-earned dollars, so that the privileged few at the top can live the high life. This is shameful and reprehensible. God doesn’t command His followers to tithe, so that pastors can sport Armani suits and $500 watches!
I also agree that it’s dangerous to teach Christians that there’s a specific formula you can follow that guarantees you’ll achieve incredible prosperity in every area of your life. What’s more, we as God’s people are not to put our main focus on the things of this earth. Jesus is clear that we are to “lay up treasures in heaven.”
While I read, and was encouraged by, Joel Osteen’s first book Your Best Life Now, I must confess that I was troubled by his emphasis on this life. Jesus wants to bless us now, but the Christian’s best life is not in this fallen earth. There is no better life than eternity with God. In fairness, I believe Osteen would agree with that statement. I just feel that sometimes we get our focus off track.
Most importantly, while Osteen does mention the salvation plan in his books and at the end of his broadcasts, it’s often just that: a mention. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is to be the primary message of the church. I have no problem with a Christian writing a motivational, self-help book. Zig Ziglar has written some great ones! But I do have a concern when an entire ministry seems to revolve around a motivational, self-help message that relegates the Gospel to a mere “mention.” Of course, Osteen would likely respond that he’s merely following Paul’s instructions in I Corinthians 9 to become “all things to all men” and thus meet audiences where they are. And it’s a fair point. I think there is value in addressing people’s felt needs. Rick Warren would likewise agree.
I will also concede that God has probably used Osteen’s inspirational messages to draw people to salvation in Jesus Christ. But I do believe major caution is in order here. If a person sees Jesus as an add-on (an impression one can easily get when Jesus is simply tacked on as a final, parting mention to an otherwise secular-sounding message), that person hasn’t experienced the call to repentance necessary for salvation. And that’s no small matter. How many of the professions of faith in Christ attributable to Osteen’s ministry represent true repentance (and thus true salvation) versus how many constitute people just trying to tack Jesus onto their lives with no real heart change? I don’t know the answer, and neither do you. Only God does. But it is a question I hope Joel Osteen and the leaders of Lakewood Church are praying about.
Putting God in Charge of Your Life
Nevertheless, I return to Bob’s question: “Who benefits from your being poor?” Rick Warren, for all his just criticisms of the excesses of prosperity theology, is himself doing quite well. God has provided for his needs and given Pastor Warren a global reach that he wouldn’t have otherwise had, were it not for the fame and fortune. True to his character, Pastor Warren has shoveled most of the fortune back God’s way. I read that Warren has paid back his church all the money they ever paid him in a salary and, if I remember correctly, only takes a dollar a year salary now. As to his book earnings, he tithes 90 percent of those earnings and lives off the 10 percent. What a testimony! Likewise, Joel Osteen several years ago stopped taking a salary from his church. Other pastors over the years, such as the legendary W.A. Criswell, were able to do the same when their royalties provided well beyond their needs. There is nothing wrong with this. In fact, it’s a great thing. It helps them and it helps their churches. And it illustrates precisely where I think people like Bob Yates are coming from. The more resources God gives you – whether it be in the way of time, talents, or wealth – the more God can use you.
In our conversations, Bob never said money should be viewed as anything more than a tool. It is a means to an end. And the “end” is where you can really tell a person’s heart. If you desire more money so that you can fly in private jets, own your own yacht, wear expensive clothes to show off to your acquaintances, shop in status-oriented stores, and just “enjoy the good life,” then you are “laying up treasures on earth.” But if, like Rick Warren, you want God to bless you financially, so that you can do more for Him, then your heart is in the right place.
There is nothing morally wrong or sinful with a person being rich. If so, then how do you explain Abraham, Job, Solomon, and Esther (who, can we agree, married into significant wealth)? The issue is not how much money you make or have, but rather what you do with it.
For my own part, I hope that God provides me with whatever I need to fulfill the call He has placed on my life. For I am here for Him, not for myself. I am fully responsible to God for what He gives me now and what He chooses to give me in the future. And, based on the promise of His Word, the more faithful I am to following Him, obeying Him, and serving Him, the better positioned I will be for His blessings along with His additional instructions.
