Pastor Tubbs
Brian Tubbs is the pastor of Olney Baptist Church in Olney, Maryland. He is also the Feature Columnist for Protestantism at Suite101.com.
Posts by Pastor Tubbs
Michigan Lottery Winner Collecting Food Stamps Reveals Important Lesson on Morality for American Society
0Last September, Michigan’s Amanda Clayton won $1 million in the Michigan state lottery. A few days ago, Clayton acknowledged she still received $200 in monthly food assistance. Following the very understandable public outcry, the state revoked her benefits. The story came to light when local media revealed the lottery winner “shamelessly” racking up purchases with her lottery windfall, including a new car and house, while also receiving and utilizing $200 per month in food assistance, courtesy of the Michigan taxpayer.There are several things very disturbing about all this, not the least of which is the apparent inefficiency and lack of communication within Michigan’s state government. But for this brief blog post, I want to focus on Ms. Clayton’s apparent indifference to the whole situation and the complete absence of anything resembling a moral compass.
When asked about all this, Clayton was quoted as saying, “I thought that they would cut me off, but since they didn’t, I thought maybe it was okay because I’m not working.” First, a million dollar windfall is enough to help anyone get back on their feet. At age 24, there’s no reason why Clayton shouldn’t use that money to enhance her education and professional skills and….start working. But let’s leave aside the troubling “I’m not working” part of her statement and focus instead on the premise that essentially says: “If the government lets me get away with something, it must be okay.” Is that the new standard of morality in America? It gets worse.
Clayton was asked if she felt she had a “right” to this taxpayer-based food assistance. Her response was “I kinda do.” To bolster this (ahem) articulate response, she cited the fact that taxes claimed close to half of her winnings, leaving her with really only about $500,000 in cash, which she is apparently burning through pretty quickly. While I sympathize with anyone’s frustrations over high taxes, I have to concede there’s an important distinction between the government taxing lottery winnings (what Clayton experienced) versus the government taxing earnings (what most Americans experience). I’m much more sympathetic with the earners. Nevertheless, Clayton is correct that, when it comes to lottery winnings, the money can go quickly. This is all the more reason not to spend it so quickly and irresponsibly. It would be far better for her to invest this money for the long term. But, again, I’m not going to get into that for now. The thing I want us to focus on is Clayton’s apparent cluelessness. For someone who, at one point, was apparently in legitimate need of public assistance, she is seemingly unaware that those who abuse the system make it more difficult for those in valid need to receive the help they legitimately require. Not only does this escape her, but she is apparently without any personal remorse that she herself abused a system that once helped her.
Clayton’s amoral worldview and lack of personal responsibility should not be what grabs our attention so much as the fact that this type of dysfunctional thinking is widespread throughout society. Our society has all but lost any kind of clear, objective, moral standard to which individuals and our nation as a whole should be held accountable. We once had it, which is what makes great speeches like Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” so compelling, as when he appealed to the principles of the Declaration of Independence. It’s that kind of objective standard to which the retired General Douglas MacArthur appealed when he spoke of “Duty, Honor, Country” before the cadets at West Point. Great leaders, like Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and more have always used appeals to an external, objective, moral standard to sway public opinion and call people to conscience. That kind of thing is fast disappearing, however, in a society where we can no longer agree on what’s right or wrong or what a marriage is or what a family is or…well…you get the idea. We are now a postmodern, relativistic society where people’s feelings, “heart,” and opinions are celebrated more than bedrock, time-proven virtue.
I am reminded of the words of C.S. Lewis: “We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.” It’s a sad time for America and hopefully our nation will wake up before it’s too late.
Kirk Cameron Learning There’s a High Price to Pay for Opposing Homosexual Marriage
0It’s okay to be a Christian in the United States of America, so long as you believe only the parts of the Bible that meet with society’s approval or at least keep your mouth shut regarding those parts that don’t. That’s the lesson Kirk Cameron is learning after honestly expressing his Bible-based views on homosexuality and marriage.
The former “Growing Pains” star ignited a firestorm when he told Piers Morgan that homosexuality was “unnatural” and “detrimental” and that no one should try to redefine marriage, an institution that is “as old as dirt.” Celebrities are stepping over one another to put the former child star in his place, and a petition drive to tell Kirk Cameron to “grow up” is already garnering thousands of signatures. Suffice it to say that Kirk Cameron won’t be starring in any more Hollywood productions!
All of this goes to prove that the gay rights community has taken command of society’s megaphone. If you speak out against homosexuality, there will be consequences…serious consequences. You may lose job contracts (as Christian speaker and author Frank Turek has suffered). You may get disciplined by your university (see Jennifer Keeton). You might even get suspended from your job (see Jerry Buell). Even if you’re a Christian organization on a college campus, you’re not safe. You can have religious views, so long as they don’t contradict homosexuality, as numerous Christian groups are learning at secular colleges. In fact, even Christian colleges are coming under fire for not openly embracing homosexual students or groups.
It would be nice to think that the Christian community was united on this, but that’s simply not the case. Many professing Christians are distancing themselves from the Bible, preferring instead the applause of society.
The pieces are falling into place for seismic changes in our society over the next several years. If you think I’m exaggerating, pay close attention to the rhetoric coming out of the gay, lesbian, and transgender community regarding those who oppose their lifestyle and agenda. They don’t hesitate to throw the words “hate” and “intolerance” around, nor do they hesitate to advocate the consigning of such views and such people to the fringes of society. Christians today can look to the persecutions of the early church for guidance as to where things are headed. Note that the Christians of the apostles’ day weren’t persecuted for their private beliefs. They were persecuted when their beliefs spilled over into the rest of society, and when those beliefs impacted social culture, local economics, or political stability. Likewise today, Christians who keep their politically incorrect views to themselves have little to fear (at least for now). It’s those Christians like Kirk Cameron that need to be concerned. Sadly, not enough Christians are standing with him.
Free eBook: “Was George Washington a Christian?” — Get it Free February 28 & 29
1As a lifelong history buff and avid blogger on the American Revolution, I wrote an eBook that examines the faith of George Washington, the father of the United States of America. Debates over the faith of America’s Founding Fathers, especially our top Founders like Washington, are frequent battlegrounds in today’s “Culture War” (the contest in our society between various world views). Those who espouse a biblical world view wish to claim Washington as their own, while those on the secular Left often argue Washington was a Deist or nominal Christian at best. If you act today (February 28) or tomorrow (February 29), you can discover the facts by getting a free copy of my short eBook Was George Washington a Christian? In order to take advantage of this offer, you need to do the following three things:
- Sign up for an Amazon account (if you don’t already have one)
- Download a free Kindle app. The free Kindle app can be used to read Amazon Kindle eBooks on your PC, tablet (like an iPad) or smart phone. You just need to go to the following link for information and instructions… Free Kindle Reading Apps
- Once you have a Kindle reading app (or a physical Kindle), you just need to “purchase” my eBook for free and then download it to your PC or device.
Since the eBook is short, it is not available as a print book at this time. I may do an expanded version later, and make that available for print, but right now, it’s only available as an eBook for the Amazon Kindle or an Amazon Kindle reading application.
Since you’re getting this eBook for NO COST, I would like to ask the following of you…
Please leave a review on its Amazon sales page.
Your review can be as simple as 1 or 2 sentences. It doesn’t have to be anything extensive. But leaving this review will really help other readers make an informed decision about whether to invest in this resource. And it will help me out. Even if your comments are negative, I can take those into account for updates and revisions.
Please note that this offer is available only for February 28 and 29, 2012. After that, the price returns to $1.76 (which is still quite a bargain).
I hope you enjoy the eBook. And please leave a review. Thank you.
Where Does the Redefinition of Marriage End?
0
One of my favorite biblical illustrations is the contrast between the builders who erected their house on the sand and those who built theirs upon a rock. When you build something — be it a family, a church, a country, or a culture — it better be on a firm foundation. I had hoped that, with the United States anyway, the family would remain on a solid foundation.
For most of American history, that was certainly the case. The family was always understood to be two or more persons joined together by birth, marriage, or adoption. And marriage, being at the center of the family, was widely understood to refer to one man and one woman who had made a loving, legal, and lifelong commitment to one another. Sure, there were people living together outside of marriage and sure, there was divorce. But these things were seen as something distinct from the ideal. The definition and understanding of marriage itself, even if only in the ideal, was secure. For most of its history, the United States respected this understanding of marriage, something that was reflected in the church, in city hall, in Congress, in literature, in movies, television, music, etc. The foundation of the family, i.e., marriage, was clear and solid.
But then, things began to change. In the last few decades, the consensus has been breaking down. The definition of marriage has been challenged and our culture’s understanding of the family is now unraveling. As a result, this redefining of marriage, coupled with all the problems our society has with marriage (abuse, divorce, infidelity, etc.), is turning our foundation from rock to sand.
The state of Maryland is now the latest to jump on the redefinition of marriage bandwagon. On March 1, 2012, the governor of Maryland will put his signature to the Civil Marriage Protection Act, which redefines marriage to include couples of the same gender. The state of Maryland now joins seven other states and the District of Columbia in allowing same-sex marriage. It is yet another victory for the gay rights community and, in the words of The Washington Post, one more step in “expanding nationwide momentum for gay rights.” And this momentum will likely carry the redefinition of marriage to even more states, and probably fairly soon, the entire United States.
For a growing number of Americans, including a great many who profess to be Christians, the redefinition of marriage raises no alarm. To them, the fact that God is the One who created and defined marriage (see the book of Genesis) is not worthy of serious, if any, consideration. I expect non-Christians to disregard God and the Bible, but when Christians do it, it’s something else entirely. But I’ll set that issue aside for the moment, and simply ask this…
Since gender is no longer a relevant consideration when defining marriage, what’s to stop society from saying that a NUMBER (as in the number “two”) is likewise no longer relevant?
For the record, I agree that the government shouldn’t stop consenting adults from living together. Back in the 1990s, gay rights activists won a major victory when the U.S. Supreme Court in Lawrence vs. Texas struck down all laws barring sodomy and homosexuality. Even though I believe the Bible is clear on homosexuality being a sin (and thus I believe churches should teach the truth on the issue of homosexuality, regardless of what the government says), I nevertheless fully understand gays and lesbians seeing Lawrence vs. Texas as a civil rights issue. The redefinition of marriage is, however, a different story altogether. By using the strong arm of government to force a redefinition of marriage onto society overall, they are no longer advocating simply for their rights.
Supporters of same-sex marriage often point to concerns over wills, estate settlements, hospital visitation, etc. Nevertheless, these considerations can be addressed through a number of means, including power-of-attorney agreements and civil unions. Many states have, in fact, set up civil partnerships to confirm that gay and lesbian couples have the same exact rights as married heterosexual couples. And on this point, I agree that states have every right to oversee and define contracts (including civil unions). Yet civil unions aren’t good enough for the gay rights community today. They want a redefinition of marriage to include them. And they are getting their way.
If trends continue, it won’t be long before the United States of America redefines marriage, probably by edict of the Supreme Court. Gays and lesbians are actively pushing for this by trying to get the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) overturned in Court or repealed by Congress. Once that happens, the U.S. Supreme Court will likely rule that all fifty states must accept gay marriage, given the “full faith and credit clause” of the Constitution. All that is coming. It’s only a matter of time, unless there’s a major shift in public opinion. Not only that, but this redefinition of marriage in society and culture will permeate even more into our schools, television, movies, music, and the church. Those who remain opposed to same-sex marriage will be increasingly ostracized and marginalized. So, given the likelihood of gay marriage being legalized across the nation and thus marriage being fundamentally redefined, I return to my question…
What’s to stop society from saying that three people can marry (instead of two)?
Obviously, the government should do everything it can to prevent the type of scary, polygamous cults that crop on the news now and then. These cults usually involve one man with a harem of women, some of whom are underage. That type of twisted exploitation should be opposed by government, and I fully expect it will continue to be opposed by government. However, what about three or four consenting adults? What if you have three consenting adults (three men, two women and a man, two men and a woman, whatever) who say they love each other and want to be together and they want to be married? What do we say to that? If we say “no,” on what objective grounds do we deny them marriage?
Please don’t respond to this with a red herring accusation that I’m equating homosexuality with polygamy. I am not doing that. I’m simply saying that some of the same arguments being used in favor of gay marriage can also be used to favor polygamy. If we should allow two consenting adults of the same sex to marry because they love each other, then shouldn’t we also allow three people or four people (regardless of the gender mix) to marry one another? Once you redefine marriage to no longer take gender into consideration, then you are on a slippery slope.
And that slippery slope brings me back to my favorite Bible illustration. If we, as a society, can no longer agree on the definition of marriage, then what does that say about the kind of foundation we’re building families on? In this case, not only do we disagree fundamentally over the definition of marriage, but no one has really any idea where the redefinition will end. Our foundation is fast becoming slippery sand, and everyone knows what happens to a house built on sand.
Free eBook: “When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain” — Available Feb 25 and 26 for No Cost.
2How can an all-powerful and good God allow pain, suffering, and evil in the world? That’s the leading objection to Christianity and the Bible today. And it’s the objection that moved me to write an eBook that I would like to offer you today for no charge.
If you act today (February 25) or tomorrow (February 26), you can get a free copy of my short eBook When Faith Doesn’t Take Away the Pain. That’s right…FREE! In order to take advantage of this offer, you need to do the following three things:
- Sign up for an Amazon account (if you don’t already have one)
- Download a free Kindle app. The free Kindle app can be used to read Amazon Kindle eBooks on your PC, tablet (like an iPad) or smart phone. You just need to go to the following link for information and instructions… Free Kindle Reading Apps
- Once you have a Kindle reading app (or a physical Kindle), you just need to “purchase” my eBook for free and then download it to your PC or device.
Since the eBook is short, it is not available as a print book at this time. I may do an expanded version later, and make that available for print, but right now, it’s only available as an eBook for the Amazon Kindle or an Amazon Kindle reading application.
Since you’re getting this eBook for NO COST, I would like to ask the following of you…
Please leave a review on its Amazon sales page.
Your review can be as simple as 1 or 2 sentences. It doesn’t have to be anything extensive. But leaving this review will really help other readers make an informed decision about whether to invest in this resource. And it will help me out. Even if your comments are negative, I can take those into account for updates and revisions.
I hope you enjoy the eBook. Thank you.
Understanding the Theology of Rick Warren
0Rick Warren is one of the very best known pastors in the United States of America today, so much so that he’s been called “America’s Pastor.” His book The Purpose-Driven Life is one of the leading nonfiction bestsellers in the modern world. Yet he is also one of America’s most controversial figures, drawing fire from groups as disparate as gay rights advocates and Christian fundamentalists. Many Bible-believing Christians are troubled by some of the things they’ve observed in Warren’s ministry, seen in his writings, or heard from others discussing him. Some of the questions include:
- Does Rick Warren believe Muslims and Christians serve the same God?
- Is Warren’s book The Purpose-Driven Life not Christo-centric enough?
- Why doesn’t Warren talk more about salvation in Christ in his bestseller?
- Would he write it differently if he could do today?
- Does Rick Warren believe repentance is necessary for salvation?
- Does Warren believe in a literal hell?
- Where does Rick Warren come down on the debate over predestination and free will?
- What are Warren’s views on sexuality, abortion, and more?
Last year, Reformed theologian and pastor John Piper interviewed megachurch pastor and bestselling author Rick Warren. The questions above and more are addressed in this remarkable interview. I want to make clear that I don’t agree with all of Piper’s theology (I am not a five-point Calvinist, for example), nor do I endorse all of Rick Warren’s choices (such as some of his speaking engagements). Nevertheless, I am a strong believer in letting people speak for themselves, rather than caricaturing and attacking them myself. It’s in that spirit that I encourage you to visit the link below and watch this very interesting interview…
I hope you enjoy the interview.
Six Things Pastors Love to Hear From Church Members
0When it comes to a post like this, I wish I were NOT a pastor, so that I could post it without any apprehension that it will be dismissed as self-serving. I’m going to have to take that risk, though, as I believe God has allowed me to learn some things over the last 5 years I’ve served as a senior pastor…a few of which I want to pass on through this note. Let me say clearly that, yes, I’ve been hurt at times in ministry, and perhaps some of that frustration will come through in this. I hope not, because I’m not writing this with that kind of spirit, but I’m human, so I welcome you to set aside anything that comes from my flesh.
The TRUTH is…I am blessed. I count myself VERY blessed to serve the church I now pastor as well as the previous congregation I served in Ohio. I have nothing but gratitude and love to convey to each of those congregations. Even the times I’ve been hurt pale in comparison to what I’ve seen and heard from others in the ministry. So many of my pastor friends have had far worse situations. I hope you’ll take it in the humble spirit it’s offered and think of these things in relation to your own pastor in your own congregation.
Here are six things every pastor wants to hear and loves to hear from members of the church he serves:
1) “I’m praying for you.”
Every pastor wants to know that the members he serves are lifting him and his family up in prayer. Spiritual warfare is real in ministry, and pastors need prayer cover. Many years ago, when I learned that a pastor I loved fell into sin, my first and painful realization was that I wasn’t praying for him. Pastors are human. They are susceptible to stress, anxiety, temptation, etc., etc. They need prayer.
Prayer is especially pertinent when it comes to grievances. We are quick to complain and slow to prayer. Christians spend a great deal of time, in fact, complaining and griping, and very little in prayer. When you’re upset about something in the church or something with your pastor, why not devote the majority of your time to prayer over the matter? And when it comes time to talk about the issue, rather than complain about it, follow Jesus’ prescription for church conflict in Matthew 18.
Pray for your pastor and let your pastor know that you’re doing so.
2) “Thank you.”
Sometimes, a simple thank you goes a long way. If your pastor preaches a message that touches your heart, why not thank him for it? After all, he spent many hours in prayer and preparation before giving that message. Why not thank him for that time and effort? If the pastor has helped you through a crisis in your life or was there for you when you needed it, thank him. Of course, it doesn’t have to be anything dramatic. It may simply be that you recognize he did something nice for the church or for someone else – or maybe you just want to acknowledge his overall commitment. It’s never wrong to let someone know you appreciate his or her efforts.
3) “We’re glad to have you as our pastor.”
You may not realize it, but even the most beloved pastors have a few disgruntled members in their congregation that would prefer they find somewhere else to pastor. And those are the voices, either directly or indirectly, that pastors tend to hear the most. Obviously, in some cases, pastors have disqualified themselves. In those cases, they need to be lovingly removed. But failing dereliction of duty or some kind of moral failure (see I Timothy 3), the pastor deserves the support of his congregation. And the congregation should show that support by encouraging him. It’s a biblical command, in fact, that we are to “encourage one another” in the church. Encourage your pastor.
4) “Did you take your day off this week?”
It is one of the Ten Commandments, and yet many pastors do NOT take a day off of work. In fact, I dare say that most pastors fail to truly set their work aside completely for at least one day a week. Not only is it a biblical command that they do so, but numerous medical and psychological studies will tell you that it’s healthy to take at least one day off of work each week. And labor unions have conditioned the American workforce to, in fact, expect two days off a week. This is the toughest challenge for me, because ministry is never done. There’s always another phone call to make, another meeting that I need to attend to, or another family that needs pastoral care. It never ends. I have to force myself to stop and take a day of rest. And it’s not easy. Yet, it’s healthy and it’s biblical…and essential for a solid family life. I hope your church is the type of church that not only allows its pastor to take a day off each week, but FORCES him to do so.
5) “How can I help?”
A pastor is human. He can only be at one place at one time. He’s not always available. When he’s visiting with one family, he can’t simultaneously visit with another. When he’s in a close door, sensitive meeting, he can’t take a phone call, unless it’s a dire emergency. When he’s on a date with his wife, he should NOT take a phone call.
And when he’s in prayer or in Bible study, he needs to guard that time, because those are the most important aspects of his job (see Acts 6). The pastor is limited in his time, his presence, his availability, and his energy. In his great book “The Disciple-Making Church,” Bill Hull makes the argument that churches are NOT supposed to center around pastors. He writes: “Can one man preach Sunday morning, Sunday night, and Wednesday night; attend committee meetings, Sunday school socials, and denominational meetings; and still do all the counseling and administration of the church? No!” Hull makes the point that it’s not supposed to be that way anyway. The pastor not only needs help, but is SUPPOSED to get help. Why? Because the entire body of believers in each church is to do the work of the ministry, not simply the pastor (see I Corinthians 12, Ephesians 4 and Galatians 6).
What’s more, the pastor does NOT have all the spiritual gifts, yet (deep down) many church members think that when God calls a pastor, He equips that pastor with all the talents, gifts, and abilities needed to meet the expectations of the church to which the pastor is called. It’s ludicrous…not to mention completely unbiblical. It’s not the pastor that is supposed to bear the burdens of everyone in the church. The church members are supposed to “bear one another’s burdens” (see Galatians 6). The pastor’s call is very specific, and God will equip the pastor with the gifts, talents, and abilities he needs to fulfill that specific call…a call that must be performed to God’s specifications, not the individual preferences or demands of every church member. Nevertheless, the myth that the pastor should be good at everything and meet every need persists. Bill Hull writes mockingly of such expectations, taking on the role of a disgruntled church member: “[The pastor] doesn’t preach as well as Chuck Swindoll, counsel like James Dobson, care for others the way MOther Teresa does, manage like Peter Drucker, and motivate like Ronald Reagan.” Some pastors are great at casting a vision and/or planning out their ministry and/or managing staff. Others are great at visitation, counseling, and hospitality. Others are supremely gifted in teaching and preaching. Some pastors are big picture oriented, while others are great at details. Some pastors excel in large churches, while others do great in small churches. Some pastors thrive in the associate, support role, but struggle as a senior pastor. Very few pastors are highly gifted in all of preceding areas.
Pastors are diverse in their personalities, gifts, talents, strengths, etc. Unfortunately, this is not always accepted by churches. Hull explains: “People will accept one another’s strengths and weaknesses, but they do not extend the same courtesy to the clergy. They look at the pastor’s strengths, and instead of thanking God for his gifts and allowing him to concentrate in those areas, they roundly criticize his nongiftedness and hound him to work on his ‘weakness.’ Few people could survive the ridiculous expectations churches place on their leaders. We stand them up in front and proceed to pick them apart.”
Rather than “pick apart” your pastor, help him. Get involved in the church and fill in the gaps. Don’t complain about the areas of weaknesses. Step in and support those areas. Ministry is a team effort.
6) “We love you.”
There have been some dark times in ministry…times of loneliness and, yes, discouragement. Times when I’ve felt like “What’s the use?” Just being real with you. And almost every time, God has sent a church member my way to encourage me and say those words: “We love you.” When the words are sincere, I can’t tell you how much they’ve meant to me. One time, after a week that I’d been slammed by one of my critics and was feeling pretty low, one of the deacons in our church reached over, gave me a one-arm bear hug and said: “Love you, brother!” That meant a lot to me.
Your pastor isn’t just your pastor. He’s your brother in Christ. And God wants His family, His children, to be united in love. You should love your brothers and sisters in Christ as if they were your real flesh-and-blood family. This should especially be the case in your church. God wants unity, harmony, and joy in His congregations….not gossip, slander, division, and petty squabbling. “By this shall all men know that you are my disciples,” declared the Son of God. “That you have love one for another!” Do you love your pastor? If not, you should. And, if you do, then tell him.
Let me close by saying I count myself blessed to serve a wonderful congregation in Olney, Maryland. I love them and they (at least most of them
) love me. I’m not writing this to send a message to them or my previous congregation in Ohio. I truly am not. I’m writing this, because it’s been on my heart to write something like this for months. After much delay, I felt God push me to do so. I hope it will give my readers a window into a pastor’s heart. That is the extent of my “agenda” (such as it is). And hopefully, a few of you will be encouraged to pray a little more for your pastor and perhaps take some of these ideas to heart.
God bless you.
Pastoral Leadership vs Pastoral Care: What Does the Bible Say About Pastoral Ministry and the Role of a Pastor?
0When you think of a “pastor,” what do you see in your mind? Do you visualize someone visiting the sick and the shut-in, comforting those in grief, and responding to peoples’ complaints and concerns? Or do you see a leader as recruiting, training, rallying, and organizing the troops to “fight the good fight of faith”? If you said the former, you see a pastor as being a congregational chaplain. For you, the “pastoral care” part of ministry is what’s most important and that’s what you expect from your pastor. If you answered with the latter, you understand the biblical role of a pastor better than most Christians do today.
What Does the Bible Say About a Pastor’s Role?
In a recent committee meeting (yes, we Baptists love committee meetings), I offered that a senior pastor should be focused more on outreach and assimilation than on taking care of the emotional needs or spiritual burdens of the flock. For the record, I didn’t say that a pastor should only do outreach and assimilation. I fully accept that part of a pastor’s role is to help serve the valid needs of the current congregation he leads. Nevertheless, one of those present at this meeting did not share my sense of priorities. She responded: “Well, Pastor, you came to the wrong church then.” How encouraging.
Of course, her sentiment doesn’t just describe the attitude of a few members of my current place of ministry. (And, thankfully, it’s the minority view at the church I currently serve). It describes the sentiment that most churchgoing Christians in America have. They see the pastor as a 24/7, on-call, personal chaplain to every member of the congregation. As mentioned in a previous post, most churches today, at least most in the United States, are not interested in their pastor leading them or challenging them or rebuking them or calling them to sacrifice. They want their pastor to “take care of them.” And this mentality has a lot to do with why so many pastors suffer from strained marriages, broken homes, bad health, and depression. And it’s why so many are dropping out of the ministry altogether. If only God’s people would look to the Scriptures with an obedient heart, they would see that these expectations of a pastor are not at all what Jesus had in mind when He gave pastors to the church (see Ephesians 4).
The church’s primary mission and purpose is to lead people to Jesus Christ, baptize those who accept Christ, and then teach them what Jesus taught. To get started on this mission (the Great Commission), the early church “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers” (Acts 2:42, KJV). And to make this work, Paul says that Jesus gave the church “some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ” (Ephesians 4:11-12, NKJV).
In this passage from Ephesians, each particular office is preceded by the word “some” (tous de). Yet the recurring “some” (tous de) is not given before the word “teacher” (didaskalous). “Pastors” and “teachers” are instead connected by the simple conjunction “and” (kai). This indicates Paul is referring to a singular office with dual roles. The pastor is, at once, the pastor (poimen meaning “shepherd”) and teacher.
The purpose of the pastor-teacher is therefore not necessarily to visit the sick, call on the shut-ins, perform weddings, or take care of the needs and wants of the flock. There’s nothing wrong with those things, particularly if the pastor does them as an example and means of instruction to others in the congregation. The main purpose of “pastors and teachers” (again, same office) is “for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ…” (Ephesians 4:12, NKJV).
Pastoral Leadership
The main responsibility of the pastor is not pastoral care, but rather leadership. The pastor is to lead, as he is the under shepherd of Jesus’ church at the local level. I realize that it’s possible for pastors to abuse such a position, and it’s happened all too often. But this doesn’t negate the plain teaching of Scripture. On the contrary, it merely shows why it’s vital for churches to insure that the pastors they call meet the qualifications Paul lays out in I Timothy 3 and Titus 1. Those qualifications wouldn’t be so high, if the responsibilities of the office weren’t so serious.
The pastor’s role is to lead the church in a way that it is able to accomplish its God-given mandate, namely the Great Commission, and that the body of Christ is able to support one another according to biblical instruction. In the case of the Great Commission, the pastor is responsible before Christ to see to it that the church effectively teaches its mission field about the Good News of Jesus Christ, baptizes those who repent and accept Christ, and teaches and trains those new converts to become disciples of Jesus.
What About Pastoral Care?
When it comes to the care of widows, orphans, shut-ins, the disabled, the homeless, the hungry, etc. and/or those Christians who are wounded in life due to marriage problems, family problems, etc., the pastor’s role is to train, motivate, and equip the congregation to effectively “bear one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6), not get lost in the details of ministry himself. This isn’t because he wants to avoid the “dirty work” of ministry. On the contrary, the pastor should do some of the ministry work himself, so that he can be an example to the others in the church. And that’s a key point. If the church is trained to expect the pastor to do everything, then how will they use their gifts in the church or experience the joys of ministry?
What’s more, when the pastor stays focused on the Big Picture, which means a heavy emphasis on training, organization, and delegation, he can multiply himself and serve more people. More people will actually be served and helped when the pastor does what the pastor is supposed to do.
The Pastor as Protector
Not only is the pastor’s role focused on multiplication and mobilization, it’s also about protection. The pastor must commit himself regularly to prayer for his congregation. In Acts 6, the apostles (the first pastors after Jesus) identified prayer as one of their leading responsibilities. That the details and burdens of ministry (benevolence and care-giving ministry specifically, by the way) were taking away prayer time was why they called on the church to elect the first deacons — officers that, in many respects, were the genesis of not only deacons, but associate pastors, officers, volunteer leaders, and staff. The pastor must devote himself to fervent prayer, not simply for God’s guidance for the church but in intercession for the members of the church. He should pray for the protection of those in the flock he is charged to lead.
In addition to prayer cover, the pastor must use his teaching responsibility to safeguard the congregation from deception. The Apostle Paul instructs Timothy to be wary of false teachers outside the church (and within the church). This is one reason why “ministry of the Word” (see Acts 6) is so vital to the work of the pastor. The pastor must make Bible study a top priority of his work week. A pastor that’s not regularly in the Word and studying it in-depth will not be effective in carrying out his responsibilities. Bible study, for the pastor, is much more important than doing a routine hospital visit, looking in on a shut-in, or handling a request for financial assistance. The deacons are supposed to take the lead in those things. The pastor must be in the Word!
The pastor must also protect the flock from division within. Sometimes, it’s people within a congregation that cause division by engaging in slander, gossip, excessive complaining (see Philippians 2), etc. The pastor must deal with that as well, hopefully with the support of the other church leaders. And in some cases, divisive members must be identified and even expelled (see Titus 3 and Matthew 18).
Support Your Pastor
One of my favorite westerns is Support Your Local Sheriff with James Garner. It’s funny, and it frankly gives me some great ideas for a comedy about church life: Support Your Local Pastor. The thing is, I’ll probably have to wait until retirement before I write it.
Before I became a pastor, I used to believe that pastors played an important role. I respected, albeit only intellectually and at a distance, what pastors went through. But, now that I am a pastor, I see it up close. It’s no longer theory. It’s personal. Because it’s personal, I realize that some of my more cynical readers may view this post as self-serving. I hope that they will look past their skepticism and cynicism and check what I write against the Scriptures. I ask the same of you. Hopefully, you are someone willing to approach God’s Word with an open mind and an obedient heart. And if so, I believe you’ll find that God indeed places a great deal of importance on the role of pastors and the ministry they perform.
The question you need to ask yourself is whether, as a church member, you support and affirm your pastor in carrying out his God-given role and responsibilities, or whether you are dragging him into the details of ministry or burdening him with your complaints and negativity. Are you supporting and helping your pastor? or are you making life challenging for him? I want to encourage you to pray about that and to pray for your pastor.
For those of you who are in the ministry, I want to encourage you to keep your eyes on God, and to remind yourself of the many folks in your ministry who do support you and pray for you. Let them be an encouragement to you. God bless you for your work.
The Faith of Ronald Reagan
0This is a wonderful tribute to Ronald Reagan, with an emphasis on his Christian faith…
Lee Strobel Offers the Case for Christmas
0Christmas is full of tradition, but can Christians credibly embrace the claims of the Bible surrounding the birth of Jesus, even in our present age of skepticism? Bestselling author Lee Strobel lays out the evidence for Jesus Christ and why we can trust the Gospel accounts of the first Christmas…